From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA01420; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 14:34:45 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA23873 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 14:34:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.83]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h9RDYh116309 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 14:34:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (CENTRAL-CITY-CARRIER-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.72]) by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h9RDYeDX026112 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 08:34:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (MELBOURNE-CITY-STREET.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.86]) by central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id h9RDJxjr000644 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 08:20:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from no-knife.mit.edu (NO-KNIFE.MIT.EDU [18.7.16.64]) ) by melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h9RDCXEi023892 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 08:12:33 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jfc@localhost) by no-knife.mit.edu (8.12.9) id h9RDCYC1005087; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 08:12:34 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200310271312.h9RDCYC1005087@no-knife.mit.edu> To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Missing tabs In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 26 Oct 2003 15:28:08 GMT." <20031026152808.GA8280@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 08:12:34 -0500 From: John Carr X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 jfc:01 faq:01 faq:01 printf:01 violate:01 printf:01 caml:01 expert-eng:02 carr:05 confusing:05 hmmm:05 i've:09 john:09 agree:14 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > I've now read: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/FAQ_EXPERT-eng.html#printf > thanks. > > Hmmm ... This does appear to violate the principle of least surprise. I agree with this statement and the proposed less confusing meaning of printf. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners