From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA03195; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:07:33 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA17790 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:07:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from pecan.cc.columbia.edu (pecan.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.178]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id hAKH7V123673 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:07:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from tw304h3.cpmc.columbia.edu (tw304h3.cpmc.columbia.edu [156.111.84.180]) (user=ot14 mech=LOGIN bits=0) by pecan.cc.columbia.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAKH7RXU003564 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:07:28 -0500 (EST) From: Oleg Trott To: Ville-Pertti Keinonen Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Caml as C-- (was: Compiling a native code OCaml library into an .so?) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:07:07 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Cc: caml-list@inria.fr References: <3FBC0177.1050307@cs.caltech.edu> <200311200613.09139.oleg_trott@columbia.edu> <20031120113047.GC1387@exomi.com> In-Reply-To: <20031120113047.GC1387@exomi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311201207.07328.oleg_trott@columbia.edu> X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.35 X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; oleg:01 oleg:01 caml-list:01 asmcomp:01 asmcomp:01 qpl:01 qpl:01 gpl:01 compiler:01 ocaml:01 caml:01 afaik:01 native:02 mentions:02 patches:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Thursday 20 November 2003 06:30 am, Ville-Pertti Keinonen wrote: > > It's actually called C--...did you know that already? C-- is a separate project AFAIK (although one of the files in "asmcomp" mentions it). C-- is in its infancy, as I understand. > Look in the asmcomp and testasmcomp directories if you didn't already... > > The license might be an issue in actually using the code in a compiler > for another language, though. I just read QPL. It does not define the concept of "language" or "other language". IANAL, but I think QPL is fairly reasonable. It's like GPL, but modifications have to be "patches" and the "original developer" gets to distribute your "patches" under other licenses as well. -- Oleg Trott ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners