From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA09450; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:57:34 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA09828 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:57:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from smarthost2.mail.easynet.fr (smarthost2bis.mail.easynet.fr [212.180.1.37]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id hALIvV104787 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:57:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from [212.180.39.62] (helo=gros) by smarthost2.mail.easynet.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ANGTD-0006YU-00; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:57:31 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.11] (helo=ptit.gallu.homelinux.org) by gros with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1ANGTC-0000F3-00; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:57:30 +0100 Received: from gildor by ptit.gallu.homelinux.org with local (masqmail 0.2.20) id 1ANGT8-0JE-00; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:57:26 +0100 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:57:26 +0100 To: Martin Jambon Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Building large and portable projects Message-ID: <20031121185726.GD1154@gallu.homelinux.org> References: <20031120195614.GB441@gallu.homelinux.org> <000f01c3afd1$30033c90$0274a8c0@PWARP> <20031121052549.GA8599@davidb.org> <008301c3aff3$1030e760$0274a8c0@PWARP> <20031121064950.GA836@gallu.homelinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 le-gall:01 le-gall:01 compiles:01 loadable:01 dynlink:01 loadable:01 gall:01 ocaml:01 caml:01 emacs:01 nov:01 nov:01 preprocessor:02 preprocessor:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 05:32:50PM +0100, Martin Jambon wrote: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 sylvain.le-gall@polytechnique.org wrote: > > > My aims is to make something more Makefile like ( ie you will have the > > ability to add rules ). Off course, my first goal is to compile ml file. > > So there will be less features than Makefile. > > Are you sure? If this compiles only Caml code, nobody will use it for > serious projects. But I was thinking of loadable modules like in emacs > instead of a rigid and limited set of predefined rules. > If we think of make as a preprocessor for shell-scripts, then we can > create a preprocessor for OCaml that will do the same but will benefit > from many built-in properties that sh doesn't have and that (GNU) make > hardly provides. > Hello, I was thinking of dynlink for loadable module... But i need to investigate on other tools ( omake ). Regard Sylvain LE GALL ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners