From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA08837; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:18:43 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA08320 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:18:41 +0100 (MET) Received: from mwinf0302.wanadoo.fr (smtp3.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.28]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id hB9EIf118855 for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:18:41 +0100 (MET) Received: from iliana (AStrasbourg-206-1-5-128.w80-13.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.13.114.128]) by mwinf0302.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A62D8C00030B; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:18:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from luther by iliana with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1ATihD-0003Ix-00; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:18:39 +0100 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:18:39 +0100 To: "Yaron M. Minsky" Cc: Sven Luther , Caml List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Using Bugzilla for OCaml - will be willing to host or help setting up. Message-ID: <20031209141839.GA12665@iliana> References: <3FD52C14.4090608@cs.caltech.edu> <20031209074755.GA3735@iliana> <1070971365.12118.6395.camel@flapdragon.homeip.net> <20031209133821.GA12160@iliana> <1070977957.12118.6410.camel@flapdragon.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1070977957.12118.6410.camel@flapdragon.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Sven Luther X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 bugzilla:01 sven:01 luther:01 sven:01 luther:01 yaron:01 minsky:01 38,:01 lynx:01 bugzilla:01 ocaml:01 manually:03 wrote:03 wrote:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:52:38AM -0500, Yaron M. Minsky wrote: > On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 08:38, Sven Luther wrote: > > The fatal part is that you can't reply to the emails it sends to you to > > make a follow up, which makes it as little suitable as the current > > system as far as mail interface is concerned. > > Mildly inconvenient at worst, and hardly fatal. You want to make a > follow up, you follow the link and make the follow up. The key > advantage of the email is that you're notified of changes without having > to poll the web page manually. Sure, try to do that behind a ssh connection to your mail server. Sure lynx does a good job at viewing web pages on text-only terminals, but making followups in a lynx-based bugzilla is less than convivial. Friendly, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners