From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA04481; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 12:37:32 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAB04918 for ; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 12:37:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from pob.cs.unibo.it (pob.cs.unibo.it [130.136.10.114]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id i03BbUb18547; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 12:37:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from le1.cs.unibo.it (backle.cs.unibo.it [130.136.10.110]) by pob.cs.unibo.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4122A06A; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 12:37:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.cs.unibo.it (liu.cs.unibo.it [130.136.7.125]) by le1.cs.unibo.it (8.9.3p2/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id MAA17057; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 12:37:05 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: le1.cs.unibo.it: Host liu.cs.unibo.it [130.136.7.125] claimed to be localhost.cs.unibo.it Received: by localhost.cs.unibo.it (Postfix, from userid 2662) id A07C92ACD5; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 12:37:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 12:37:29 +0100 From: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen To: Xavier Leroy Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] posting policy and spam Message-ID: <20040103113729.GA14042@cs.unibo.it> References: <20040103102449.D31406@pauillac.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040103102449.D31406@pauillac.inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Organization: Department of computer science, University of Bologna, Eurpean Union X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: yes; 1.00; sacerdoti:01 coen:01 sacerdot:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 sacerdot:01 iieo:99 iieo:99 biz:99 biz:99 gif:99 $$$:99 monthly:99 gif:99 $$$:99 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Dear Xavier, are you sure of your diagnosis? I am asking since the spam messages I have received from caml-list were marked correctly by spam-oracle as spam: <<<< X-Original-To: sacerdot@cs.unibo.it X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com From: Michael Bienenfeld To: ytolun@isnet.net.tr Subject: [Caml-list] Don't Miss This Opportunity. iieo X-Spam: yes; 1.00; iieo:99 biz:99 biz:99 gif:99 $$$:99 monthly:99 images:98 +htm:97 htm:97 click:97 patrick:04 www:91 www:91 michael:08 opportunity:90 X-Spam: unknown; 0.28; ocaml:01 biz:98 htm:98 biz:98 htm:98 gif:98 $$$:98 +beginners:01 bin:01 archives:01 inria:01 inria:01 opportunity:98 bug:02 caml:02 >>>> The first X-Spam was added by INRIA, the second one by my copy of spamoracle. (I know for sure since I have removed the two header lines and I have applied spamoracle -mark by hand, obtaining exactly the second line. IMHO, the conclusion is that spammers have not become smarter. Simply there is something wrong with the INRIA procmail and the X-Spam:yes messages are no longer filtered out. Regards, C.S.C. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Real name: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen PhD Student in Computer Science at University of Bologna E-mail: sacerdot@cs.unibo.it http://www.cs.unibo.it/~sacerdot ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners