From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA24252; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:17:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA24913 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:17:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from pob.cs.unibo.it (pob.cs.unibo.it [130.136.10.114]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id i088Hj517342 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:17:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from le1.cs.unibo.it (backle.cs.unibo.it [130.136.10.110]) by pob.cs.unibo.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40EBB2A138 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:17:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from fistandantilus.takhisis.org (n32d68.cs.unibo.it [130.136.32.68]) by le1.cs.unibo.it (8.9.3p2/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id JAA27333 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:17:45 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: le1.cs.unibo.it: Host n32d68.cs.unibo.it [130.136.32.68] claimed to be fistandantilus.takhisis.org Received: by fistandantilus.takhisis.org (Postfix, from userid 3148) id 7238E274153; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:17:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:17:44 +0100 From: Stefano Zacchiroli To: Caml List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] 3.07: debug information on camlp4-processed files is missing the file name? Message-ID: <20040108081744.GC27608@fistandantilus.takhisis.org> Mail-Followup-To: Caml List References: <3FF9BA9E.603@cs.caltech.edu> <54D8B96E-3FBC-11D8-BEFF-00039310CAE8@inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54D8B96E-3FBC-11D8-BEFF-00039310CAE8@inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; bononia:01 caml-list:01 3.07:01 camlp:01 2004:99 damien:01 artem:01 camlp:01 offsets:01 offsets:01 bononia:01 mio:99 ero:99 reso:99 che:99 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:18:31PM +0100, Damien Doligez wrote: > You can try this patch, developed by Artem Prysyznuk. We haven't > incorporated it because we are doing extensive changes to camlp4 > to deal correctly with new-style locations. Please let me know > whether it works for you. Do this patch change also the output format of -dtypes option when used in combination with camlp4? Actually while using camlp4, the .annot file generated uses offsets that are all referred to the beginning of file; while not using camlp4 offsets are referred to the beginning of each line. I'm asking because I've written vim support for .annot files, but actually it works only with non camlp4 generated .annot files ... Cheers. -- ^Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy$ ^zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -- http://www.bononia.it/zack$ ^Frequentando il mio maestro mi ero reso conto [.] che la logica poteva$ ^servire a molto a condizione di entrarci dentro e poi di uscirne -Adso$ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners