From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA10862; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:35:31 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA10739 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:35:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from mwinf0103.wanadoo.fr (smtp1.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.30]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id i0JCZTv27313 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:35:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from iliana (AStrasbourg-206-1-9-241.w80-13.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.13.236.241]) by mwinf0103.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 779261BFFF3D; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:35:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from luther by iliana with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AiYcl-0005E2-00; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:35:23 +0100 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:35:23 +0100 To: Remi Vanicat Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: SPAM again?! [xdfsnwu@lycos.com: [Caml-list] bongo ipso eurasia] Message-ID: <20040119123523.GA19957@iliana> References: <20040118105639.GA517@first.in-berlin.de> <871xpxc4cz.dlv@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871xpxc4cz.dlv@wanadoo.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Sven Luther X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 sven:01 luther:01 sven:01 luther:01 2004:99 oliver:01 in-berlin:01 oliver:01 bandel:01 caml-list:01 spamoracle:01 ocaml:01 writes:01 remi:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 10:51:40PM +0100, Remi Vanicat wrote: > oliver@first.in-berlin.de (Oliver Bandel) writes: > > > Hi, > > > > this SPAM was NOT blocked. > > > > Maybe the filter of the Caml-list has a problem? > > Well, one of them pass my filter too, these are cleverly done SPAM to > pass through spam filter. > > > If this goes throigh the filter, the spammers may use that > > hole in the filter, and in some weeks we may again have to > > delete 60 mails per day by hand? > > Well, ocaml could filter machine listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com > And the spam filter might be improved, or might learn (I don't know > what kind of filter the caml-list use.) Spamoracle probably, which cannot cope with those anti-bayesian filter spams :/ Friendly, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners