From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id DAA23012; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 03:41:28 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA22807 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 03:41:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from speakeasy.org (dialup-67.75.195.6.Dial1.Seattle.Level3.net [67.75.195.6]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id i0L2fPP20726 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 03:41:25 +0100 (MET) Received: (from shawnw@localhost) by speakeasy.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) id i0L2Yb102178 for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:34:37 -0800 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:34:36 -0800 From: Shawn Wagner To: Ocaml Mailing List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ANNOUNCE: mod_caml 1.0.6 - includes security patch Message-ID: <20040121023436.GA599@speakeasy.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ocaml Mailing List References: <200401210148.20003.exa@kablonet.com.tr> <20040121003455.GA27898@davidb.org> <200401210434.47781.exa@kablonet.com.tr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401210434.47781.exa@kablonet.com.tr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; shawnw:01 caml-list:01 2004:99 eray:01 ozkural:01 2004:99 camlp:01 shawnw:01 caml:01 speakeasy:01 speakeasy:01 0200,:01 patch:02 syntax:02 constructs:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 04:34:47AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote: > On Wednesday 21 January 2004 02:34, David Brown wrote: > > What does this function do? You could argue for any result a, (a+1), > > (a+2), or (a+3). The casual definition of the where clause doesn't > > specify precedence. Obviously, an implementation would have to chose > > one, but there is no clear reason one choice is better than the other. > > I guess some syntactic constructs are fairly subjective. I wonder what the > designers thought of a where clause. > Could it be done as a syntax extension via camlp4? -- Shawn Wagner shawnw@speakeasy.org ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners