Tnx for you comments. My example was wrong as Damien pointed out
because sets are immutable and I was using them in a very wrong way.
I got around the problem using an object with a mutable val. I don't
think this is the best solution but I couldn't figure out how to do it
with using simple records...

attacched there is the code snippet...

tnx.

p


On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 02:27:46PM +0100, Damien Doligez wrote:
> If you really need mutable sets, maybe you should use the Hashtbl
> module instead of Set.

-- 
++ Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to 
   how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know 
   I don't know...
++ Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
   See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html