From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA18660; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:32:11 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA18578 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:32:09 +0100 (MET) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from eposta.kablonet.com.tr ([62.248.102.66]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id i0SDW6v20147 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:32:07 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 77403 invoked by uid 0); 28 Jan 2004 13:38:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 195.174.173.82) (exa@kablonet.com.tr@195.174.173.82) by 0 with SMTP; 28 Jan 2004 13:38:15 -0000 From: Eray Ozkural Reply-To: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr Organization: Bilkent University CS Dept. To: Alexander Epifanov Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml killer Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:30:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.50 Cc: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20040127063230.GA12482@inv_machine> In-Reply-To: <20040127063230.GA12482@inv_machine> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200401281530.32605.exa@kablonet.com.tr> X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; eray:01 ozkural:01 caml-list:01 trolling:01 2004:99 32,:01 skala:99 erlang:01 skala:99 eray:01 ozkural:01 erayo:01 bilkent:01 bilkent:01 ankara:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk I think you're trolling. Have a nice day, On Tuesday 27 January 2004 08:32, Alexander Epifanov wrote: > Hello, > > I have read message about Skala language, and I think (it's only my IMHO), > that ocaml have no future without some features, like concurrent > programming (CP) and chance to use libraries from the other languages. > > 1) Erlang uses build in CP, but Skala has a library for it, IMHO it would > be a good way for ocaml feature. Thread module isn't enough for effective > usage of CP. > > 2) No one would use ocaml without libraries, and it's so hard to rewrite > them all in ocaml. external functions aren't enough to use libraries from > Languages like java or c++. > > Are any plans about these two features exists ? > > Thanks. -- Eray Ozkural (exa) Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara KDE Project: http://www.kde.org http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo Malfunction: http://malfunct.iuma.com GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners