From: Chet Murthy <chet@watson.ibm.com>
To: Chet Murthy <chet@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Berger <martinb@dcs.qmul.ac.uk>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml killer
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:04:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200401290004.i0T04Ytl007222@bismarck-chet.watson.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:00:49 EST." <200401290000.i0T00ntl006988@bismarck-chet.watson.ibm.com>
>>>>> "CM" == Chet Murthy <chet@watson.ibm.com> writes:
CM> All of these things, in my opinion, benefit from being written
CM> in high-level languages -- significantly higher than CCured
CM> and Cyclone.
CM> The high-level abstraction capabilities of CAML shine here,
CM> and do some of capabilities of Java in these applications.
I wasn't clear here. The high-level capabilities of both Java and
CAML are useful in writing such systems. Too bad Java/the JVM's
behavioural attributes make it totally unsuited. Ah, well.
For those who don't understand what I mean, take a look at
InstallShield MultiPlatform. Also look at "javac" itself. And "jar".
Ask yourself how such simple problems have admitted such awful
solutions in Java. Marvel at the foolishness of the creators of these
artifacts.
--chet--
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-29 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-27 6:32 Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27 8:56 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-27 9:43 ` Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27 18:32 ` Shawn Wagner
2004-01-28 4:38 ` skaller
2004-01-28 5:30 ` james woodyatt
[not found] ` <40168498.6070708@tfb.com>
2004-01-27 19:10 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-28 13:29 ` David Fox
2004-01-28 15:12 ` Eray Ozkural
2004-01-27 9:41 ` Alexander Danilov
2004-01-27 9:57 ` Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27 16:43 ` Eric Stokes
2004-01-27 18:19 ` David Fox
2004-01-27 18:47 ` Richard Jones
2004-01-27 19:29 ` Eric Stokes
2004-01-28 13:30 ` Eray Ozkural
2004-01-28 23:26 ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-28 23:47 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 0:00 ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-29 0:04 ` Chet Murthy [this message]
2004-01-29 0:11 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 0:34 ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-29 0:47 ` [Caml-list] ocaml killer' Matt Gushee
2004-01-29 8:52 ` [Caml-list] ocaml killer Thomas Fischbacher
2004-01-29 16:20 ` fancy types (was Re: [Caml-list] ocaml killer) William Lovas
2004-01-29 17:13 ` james woodyatt
2004-01-29 17:26 ` Benedikt Grundmann
2004-01-29 17:17 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-01-29 17:41 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-01-29 19:18 ` William Lovas
2004-01-30 10:36 ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-01-31 3:39 ` William Lovas
2004-02-01 2:11 ` Vasile Rotaru
2004-02-02 11:08 ` Florian Hars
2004-01-29 18:33 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-29 17:53 ` [Caml-list] ocaml killer skaller
2004-01-29 5:20 ` Brian Hurt
2004-01-29 6:36 ` Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-29 8:53 ` [Caml-list] ocaml and concurrency james woodyatt
2004-01-29 9:46 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-01-29 10:37 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 11:51 ` Michael Hicks
2004-01-29 12:20 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-29 12:43 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 15:42 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-01-29 16:11 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 16:56 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-01-29 17:19 ` james woodyatt
2004-01-29 17:43 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 17:54 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-01-29 18:08 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-30 0:19 ` Lauri Alanko
2004-01-29 19:37 ` skaller
2004-01-30 0:05 ` Martin Berger
2004-01-30 6:52 ` Brian Hurt
2004-01-30 8:53 ` Issac Trotts
2004-01-30 20:45 ` skaller
2004-01-31 6:29 ` Brian Hurt
2004-01-30 20:12 ` skaller
2004-01-29 18:35 ` skaller
2004-01-29 9:56 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-29 18:26 ` skaller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-23 10:19 [Caml-list] ocaml killer Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27 8:28 ` Richard Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200401290004.i0T04Ytl007222@bismarck-chet.watson.ibm.com \
--to=chet@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=martinb@dcs.qmul.ac.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).