From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id BAA26164; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 01:49:15 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA26110 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 01:49:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from mz2.forethought.net (mzpi4.forethought.net [216.241.36.13]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id i0T0lZv19657 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 01:47:41 +0100 (MET) Received: from [216.241.35.41] (helo=swordfish) by mz2.forethought.net with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Am0LC-0008Br-Si for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:47:30 -0700 Received: from matt by swordfish with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Am0LD-0006bT-00 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:47:31 -0700 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:47:31 -0700 From: Matt Gushee To: caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml killer' Message-ID: <20040129004731.GA23315@swordfish> Reply-To: Matt Gushee Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr References: <20040127063230.GA12482@inv_machine> <200401282326.i0SNQntl004612@bismarck-chet.watson.ibm.com> <40184A2F.6040007@dcs.qmul.ac.uk> <200401290000.i0T00ntl006988@bismarck-chet.watson.ibm.com> <40184FB9.4000808@dcs.qmul.ac.uk> <200401290034.i0T0Yutl009000@bismarck-chet.watson.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401290034.i0T0Yutl009000@bismarck-chet.watson.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; gushee:01 mgushee:01 havenrock:01 caml-list:01 2004:99 chet:01 murthy:01 cc'ed:01 gushee:01 englewood:01 manure:01 mgushee:01 havenrock:01 ignores:01 --lao:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:34:56PM -0500, Chet Murthy wrote: > > [Maybe this is going off-topic. Since I'm comparing Java to Caml, > I'll leave this cc'ed to the Caml list, but if there are further > responses, it might be good to take 'em offline.] I can't speak for other list members, but I'm glad to have this on this list. As someone with much more practical than theoretical knowledge, I've long known that I liked OCaml and didn't like Java, but haven't been very sure of the reasons. So for me a rational discussion of language differences is very educational. -- Matt Gushee When a nation follows the Way, Englewood, Colorado, USA Horses bear manure through mgushee@havenrock.com its fields; http://www.havenrock.com/ When a nation ignores the Way, Horses bear soldiers through its streets. --Lao Tzu (Peter Merel, trans.) ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners