caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Epifanov <epifanov@komset.ru>
To: Chet Murthy <chet@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Epifanov <epifanov@komset.ru>, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml killer
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:36:33 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040129063633.GA4337@inv_machine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200401282326.i0SNQntl004612@bismarck-chet.watson.ibm.com>

On 18:26 Wed 28 Jan     , Chet Murthy wrote:

I agree with you on all items.
I've written a lot of java applications. "Java - slow sux" - it's right.
I don't think the JVM is a good solution. I told about scala, which used JVM,
but I don't want to tell "We need to use JVM".

The basic problem in projects in which I took part, was that I could not use
ocaml _only_ to make project complete. I wrote a lot of C/C++ functions to use
ocaml with CORBA or SNMP for example.
> 
> Alexander,
> 
> I don't know what to say, except that clearly, you should spend some
> time in the trenches, working with the COBOL of the 21st Century --
> Java.
> 
> That's what I do for a living.  I've written extremely complex Java
> systems.  I've debugged more Java code than anybody else at my current
> employer, and I'm not kidding.
> 
> And, y'know what?
> 
> Java/the JVM still sux.
> 
> I left CAML in 1994, when it still didn't have a native-code
> compiler.  I started hacking on Java in the spring of 1996.  I've got
> code in (probably) every JVM.  I've debugged dozens of very large, and
> hundreds of only somewhat large Java deployments, some of them in
> situations involving large amounts of business at risk.
> 
> And y'know what?
> 
> Java/the JVM still sux.
> 
> "concurrency"!  You ever tried to use Java threads to do anything
> meaningful?  Check out the J2EE spec.  It basically is BUILT around
> NOT sharing anything between threads.
> 
> Oh, and y'know, we have a joke: "every Java bug is a connection-pool
> (or resource-pool) bug".
> 
> Here's another: "When you arrive onsite,  grep for synchronized, and
> if you see it, put your laptop back in your bag, tell 'em you're going
> to get coffee, and don't come back".
> 
> Java/the JVM is not a systems-programming language.  Period.  Oh, and
> I'll defend that against all comers.  Difference is, though, if you
> wanna attack, I'll expect real examples, not the academic crap that
> most programming language theorists throw around.
> 
> --chet--
> 
> P.S.  I came back to CAML for personal programming in 1999, and after
> that four-year hiatus, during which I became a commercial JVM
> internals guy, as well as a commercial transaction-processing
> firefighter (think "Mr. Wolf" from _Pulp Fiction_).  So I think I have
> the experience to compare, and the verdict seems manifestly
> incontrovertible: Java/the JVM sux.
> 
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

-- 
Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-01-29  6:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-27  6:32 Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27  8:56 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-27  9:43   ` Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27 18:32     ` Shawn Wagner
2004-01-28  4:38       ` skaller
2004-01-28  5:30         ` james woodyatt
     [not found]   ` <40168498.6070708@tfb.com>
2004-01-27 19:10     ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-28 13:29       ` David Fox
2004-01-28 15:12         ` Eray Ozkural
2004-01-27  9:41 ` Alexander Danilov
2004-01-27  9:57   ` Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27 16:43     ` Eric Stokes
2004-01-27 18:19       ` David Fox
2004-01-27 18:47       ` Richard Jones
2004-01-27 19:29         ` Eric Stokes
2004-01-28 13:30 ` Eray Ozkural
2004-01-28 23:26 ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-28 23:47   ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29  0:00     ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-29  0:04       ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-29  0:11       ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29  0:34         ` Chet Murthy
2004-01-29  0:47           ` [Caml-list] ocaml killer' Matt Gushee
2004-01-29  8:52           ` [Caml-list] ocaml killer Thomas Fischbacher
2004-01-29 16:20             ` fancy types (was Re: [Caml-list] ocaml killer) William Lovas
2004-01-29 17:13               ` james woodyatt
2004-01-29 17:26                 ` Benedikt Grundmann
2004-01-29 17:17               ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-01-29 17:41                 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-01-29 19:18                   ` William Lovas
2004-01-30 10:36                     ` Thomas Fischbacher
2004-01-31  3:39                       ` William Lovas
2004-02-01  2:11                         ` Vasile Rotaru
2004-02-02 11:08                           ` Florian Hars
2004-01-29 18:33                 ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-29 17:53         ` [Caml-list] ocaml killer skaller
2004-01-29  5:20     ` Brian Hurt
2004-01-29  6:36   ` Alexander Epifanov [this message]
2004-01-29  8:53   ` [Caml-list] ocaml and concurrency james woodyatt
2004-01-29  9:46     ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-01-29 10:37       ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 11:51         ` Michael Hicks
2004-01-29 12:20         ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-29 12:43           ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 15:42         ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-01-29 16:11           ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 16:56             ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-01-29 17:19               ` james woodyatt
2004-01-29 17:43               ` Martin Berger
2004-01-29 17:54                 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-01-29 18:08                   ` Martin Berger
2004-01-30  0:19                   ` Lauri Alanko
2004-01-29 19:37                 ` skaller
2004-01-30  0:05                   ` Martin Berger
2004-01-30  6:52                     ` Brian Hurt
2004-01-30  8:53                       ` Issac Trotts
2004-01-30 20:45                       ` skaller
2004-01-31  6:29                         ` Brian Hurt
2004-01-30 20:12                     ` skaller
2004-01-29 18:35         ` skaller
2004-01-29  9:56     ` Alex Baretta
2004-01-29 18:26     ` skaller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-23 10:19 [Caml-list] ocaml killer Alexander Epifanov
2004-01-27  8:28 ` Richard Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040129063633.GA4337@inv_machine \
    --to=epifanov@komset.ru \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=chet@watson.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).