From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA04005; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 20:28:15 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA03666 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 20:28:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from mx2.ngi.de (mx2.ngi.de [213.191.74.84]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JJSDHd013341 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 20:28:13 +0100 Received: (qmail 30839 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2004 18:54:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rz.zidlicky.org) ([217.185.112.247]) (envelope-sender ) by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 19 Mar 2004 18:54:13 -0000 Received: by rz.zidlicky.org (Postfix, from userid 511) id C642970CA2; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:51:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:51:11 +0100 From: Richard Zidlicky To: Basile Starynkevitch Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] debugging a JIT compiler (from Ocaml bytecode to machine code [x86,etc...]) Message-ID: <20040319185111.GA2234@linux-m68k.org> References: <20040319143838.GA5284@bourg.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040319143838.GA5284@bourg.inria.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 debugging:01 2004:99 basile:01 compiler:01 ocaml:01 bytecode:01 jit:03 jit:03 wrote:03 complicated:04 gnu:05 platforms:05 scratch:06 fri:07 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 244 On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 03:38:38PM +0100, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: > If as a researcher or hacker you happen to write interpreters from > scratch for a new super-duper language, consider using GNU lightning, > it is very interesting and provide good results (which considerably > easier to code with than generating machine code directly). Did you comepare it with the code in Kaffe jit? It is a lot more complicated than lightning but should give results much closer to a real copmiler. Iirc it is also available for more platforms than lightning. Richard ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners