From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA05670; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 20:51:04 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA05018; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 20:51:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from mwinf0404.wanadoo.fr (smtp4.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.27]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2JJpWKW010812; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 20:51:33 +0100 Received: from lambda (AStrasbourg-206-1-25-146.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.188.146]) by mwinf0404.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5A9123800113; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 20:51:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from luther by lambda with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1B4Q1Y-0007vj-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 20:51:20 +0100 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 20:51:19 +0100 To: Richard Zidlicky Cc: Basile Starynkevitch , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] debugging a JIT compiler (from Ocaml bytecode to machine code [x86,etc...]) Message-ID: <20040319195119.GA30449@lambda> References: <20040319143838.GA5284@bourg.inria.fr> <20040319185111.GA2234@linux-m68k.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040319185111.GA2234@linux-m68k.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Sven Luther X-Miltered: at nez-perce by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 debugging:01 sven:01 luther:01 sven:01 luther:01 2004:99 2004:99 basile:01 compiler:01 ocaml:01 bytecode:01 jit:03 jit:03 wrote:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 245 On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 07:51:11PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 03:38:38PM +0100, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: > > > If as a researcher or hacker you happen to write interpreters from > > scratch for a new super-duper language, consider using GNU lightning, > > it is very interesting and provide good results (which considerably > > easier to code with than generating machine code directly). > > Did you comepare it with the code in Kaffe jit? It is a lot more > complicated than lightning but should give results much closer > to a real copmiler. Iirc it is also available for more platforms > than lightning. But not on ppc. Friendly, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners