From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA26633; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:11:27 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA27037 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:11:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (BISCAYNE-ONE-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.80]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2LLBwKW006926 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:11:58 +0100 Received: from melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (MELBOURNE-CITY-STREET.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.86]) by biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id i2LLBObA002478; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:11:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from psi-phi.mit.edu (PSI-PHI.MIT.EDU [18.187.1.35]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as jfc@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i2LLBNTC006216; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:11:24 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jfc@localhost) by psi-phi.mit.edu (8.12.9) id i2LLBNTS003306; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:11:23 -0500 Message-Id: <200403212111.i2LLBNTS003306@psi-phi.mit.edu> To: Sven Luther cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:12:33 +0100." <20040319151233.GA26339@lambda> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:11:23 -0500 From: John Carr X-Miltered: at nez-perce by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml's:01 caml-list:01 run-time:01 jfc:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 consortium:01 consortium:01 unix:02 obligation:97 library:03 cathedral:95 carr:05 completeness:93 paid:91 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 287 > So, how is that different participating in the Ocaml Consortium, and > thus making sure someone is paid to do the things you need ? Or is payng > for one thing ok, but not for the other ? I read the OCaml Consortium contract and it is not a support contract as far as I can tell. Does Inria have an obligation to fix bugs reported by members? ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners