caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brown <caml-list@davidb.org>
To: Zeno Lee <zeno.lee@earthlink.net>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] weird floating poing behavior on windows
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 12:07:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040402200759.GA12200@davidb.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <008101c418ea$3ff43780$6401a8c0@xp>

On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 02:39:43PM -0500, Zeno Lee wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what's going on here?  Is this a known issue on windows? 
> 
> C:\>ocaml
>         Objective Caml version 3.07+2
> # 0.2 *. 0.26;;
> - : float = 0.052000000000000005
> # 0.8 *. 0.7 *. 0.8;;
> - : float = 0.44799999999999995

Nothing unusual.  Floats only have a certain amount of precision.  The
toplevel prints floats out with more precision than they contain.  It
does the same thing on Linux.

For example, in C:

        #include <stdio.h>

        int
        main (int argc, char **argv)
        {
          printf ("%.17g\n", 0.2 * 0.26);
          printf ("%.17g\n", 0.8 * 0.7 * 0.8);
          return 0;
        }

prints:
        0.052000000000000005
        0.44799999999999995

Now the real question is why does the toplevel do this (and where, in
the code is it coming from).  string_of_float only uses 12 digits.

Dave Brown

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-04-02 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-02 13:41 [Caml-list] failwith, raise and type inference Paul Guyot
2004-04-02 13:49 ` Frederic van der Plancke
2004-04-02 13:56   ` Paul Guyot
2004-04-02 13:51 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2004-04-02 13:59 ` Correnson Loïc
2004-04-02 14:09 ` Luc Maranget
2004-04-02 19:39   ` [Caml-list] weird floating poing behavior on windows Zeno Lee
2004-04-02 20:03     ` Greg Bacon
2004-04-02 20:07     ` David Brown [this message]
2004-04-02 20:31       ` Zeno Lee
2004-04-02 20:50         ` Pierre Weis
2004-04-02 22:01         ` Brian Hurt
2004-04-02 21:58     ` Brian Hurt
2004-04-02 20:28   ` [Caml-list] failwith, raise and type inference Pierre Weis
2004-04-05 22:52     ` Ker Lutyn
2004-04-06  1:07       ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-04-06  5:23         ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-06 15:15           ` skaller
2004-04-06  1:15       ` Christophe TROESTLER
2004-04-06  7:05         ` skaller
2004-04-06 11:29           ` Eric C. Cooper
2004-04-09  7:18           ` Christophe TROESTLER
2004-04-09  7:32             ` Xavier Leroy
2004-04-09  8:03               ` skaller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040402200759.GA12200@davidb.org \
    --to=caml-list@davidb.org \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=zeno.lee@earthlink.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).