From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA23407; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:36:23 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA24171 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:36:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (fichte.ai.univie.ac.at [131.130.174.156]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i398bFjq024109 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:37:15 +0200 Received: from fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (markus@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i398aJHn000837; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:36:19 +0200 Received: (from markus@localhost) by fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i398aJSB000836; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:36:19 +0200 Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:36:19 +0200 From: Markus Mottl To: skaller Cc: Ocaml Mailing List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Message-ID: <20040409083619.GA443@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> Mail-Followup-To: skaller , Ocaml Mailing List References: <20020104004356.GA1672@mev> <20040408133727.GC29195@excelhustler.com> <20040408145606.GA18473@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> <20040408153056.GB30763@excelhustler.com> <20040408164404.GA19556@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> <1081491825.20677.89.camel@pelican> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1081491825.20677.89.camel@pelican> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Miltered: at nez-perce by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 dynamically:01 gpl:01 licenced:01 lgpled:01 licenced:01 lgpled:01 lgpl:01 ocaml:01 mottl:02 mottl:02 licence:03 licence:03 wrote:03 library:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 205 On Fri, 09 Apr 2004, skaller wrote: > Sure .. and even more of a pain to finally find a nice library > by Markus Mottl only to discover that hidden away in the > source is a (L)GPL licence, making it useless if you happen > for example to be making a BSD licenced product .. I'd say it depends on the way you distribute things. You may well use an LGPLed library in a BSD licenced product - at least I don't see any problem here. However, what you cannot do is that you modify the LGPLed source and put the result under a BSD licence. So what's the problem you have? If you need to modify my library (you may also ask for modifications, of course ;), just go ahead - as long as you keep the LGPL for the modified library. But this does not affect other software that uses the library: it can have any licence you want, even commercial ones. Regards, Markus -- Markus Mottl http://www.oefai.at/~markus markus@oefai.at ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners