caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
To: caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] suggestion: do not link to www.ocaml.org
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:28:41 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040414162841.GA29676@swordfish> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040414151414.GB16580@excelhustler.com>

On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 10:14:14AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > 
> > To you.  And I submit, you are a techie who thinks the word 'hacker' has
> > positive connotations.  Suits don't see it that way.  Not that I'm a
> 
> Sure, but -- who gives a damn?  The site is clearly aimed at programmers
> who will understand.  Your argument sounds like saying Slashdot is
> poorly marketed to suits because its slogan mentions "nerds".  That's
> true, but irrelevant; Slashdot isn't *trying* to attract suits.

You're comparing pears and pineapples. Although I suppose Slashdot could
be construed as representing "geek opinion," it is very clearly a site
*for* expressing opinions, and has no strong connection with any
particular technology or technical sub-community. Whereas ocaml.org
appears to (note "appears to," not "does") the public face of OCaml, a
technology that most of us would like to see more widely adopted.

Think of it this way: suppose you were a manager, and you overheard a
small group of your employees making derogatory comments about you or
your company. They weren't talking *to* you, but so what? You heard
them, and their remarks will naturally affect your judgment of them.
Similarly, people will form opinions of the OCaml community based on
what they see at ocaml.org, whether or not they are the intended
audience.

It's really unfortunate that the perfectly good word "hacker" has,
mainly due to journalistic ignorance, taken on negative connotations,
but it definitely has. People should be free to speak out on matters of
principle, but I don't see that there's any very important principle at
stake in using that word. And OCamlers are, after all, a very small
group. We need to pick our battles wisely.

> Are you sure?  Every place I've been -- large and small -- the
> decision-makers certainly sought the input of techies and, if the suits
> were making choices on language selection at all, were certainly not
> doing it by viewing a single web site.

Okay, you've got a point there. But a single Web site can nonetheless
influence their opinions.

-- 
Matt Gushee                 When a nation follows the Way,
Englewood, Colorado, USA    Horses bear manure through
mgushee@havenrock.com           its fields;
http://www.havenrock.com/   When a nation ignores the Way,
                            Horses bear soldiers through
                                its streets.
                                
                            --Lao Tzu (Peter Merel, trans.)

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-14 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-13 22:27 Henri DF
2004-04-13 22:43 ` [Caml-list] " Alan Post
2004-04-13 23:01   ` Henri DF
2004-04-13 23:29     ` Christophe TROESTLER
2004-04-13 22:58 ` [Caml-list] " Zed A. Shaw
2004-04-13 23:25   ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14  1:12     ` John Goerzen
2004-04-14  4:32       ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 15:14         ` John Goerzen
2004-04-14 16:28           ` Matt Gushee [this message]
2004-04-14 18:16           ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 18:36             ` John Goerzen
2004-04-14  5:34     ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14  6:26       ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14  6:32         ` Kenneth Knowles
     [not found]           ` <20040414070841.GA6062@roke.freak>
2004-04-14  7:32             ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 11:12       ` skaller
2004-04-14 16:01         ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-15  0:32           ` skaller
2004-04-15  5:37             ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-13 23:38   ` Karl Zilles
2004-04-13 23:00 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2004-04-14 15:17   ` Richard Jones
2004-04-14 19:05   ` Xavier Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040414162841.GA29676@swordfish \
    --to=mgushee@havenrock.com \
    --cc=caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).