From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA19567; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:53:26 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA19678 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:53:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (fichte.ai.univie.ac.at [131.130.174.156]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3EGsPjq026575 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:54:25 +0200 Received: from fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (markus@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i3EGqqHn026355; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:52:52 +0200 Received: (from markus@localhost) by fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i3EGqqYM026354; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:52:52 +0200 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:52:52 +0200 From: Markus Mottl To: Richard Jones Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why not 'include' in an .mli file? Message-ID: <20040414165252.GB19016@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Jones , caml-list@inria.fr References: <20040414164148.GA18109@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040414164148.GA18109@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Miltered: at nez-perce by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 mli:01 mli:01 ocamlc:01 pcre:01 postgres:01 dbi:99 submodule:01 intf:01 intf:01 mottl:02 mottl:02 restrict:02 unbound:02 module:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 339 On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Richard Jones wrote: > However when I added an analysis.mli file, I found that I could not > automatically 'include' symbols from Analysis_p. The following > doesn't work: > > analysis.mli: include Analysis_p > (* plus a few extra prototypes *) > > ocamlc -w s -g -I +pcre -I +postgres -I +dbi -c analysis.mli > File "analysis.mli", line 1, characters 8-24: > Unbound module type Analysis_p Note that this is a module type, not a module. You could put the module type (interface) of "Analysis_p" into the submodule "S" of the extra-file "analysis_p_intf.mli". Use it then to restrict the interface of "Analysis_p" in "analysis_p.mli", and include it in "analysis.mli" using "include Analysis_p_intf.S". Regards, Markus -- Markus Mottl http://www.oefai.at/~markus markus@oefai.at ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners