From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA12976; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:47:19 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA13207 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:47:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (fichte.ai.univie.ac.at [131.130.174.156]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3F9mJjq009475 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:48:20 +0200 Received: from fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (markus@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i3F9lGHn007252; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:47:16 +0200 Received: (from markus@localhost) by fichte.ai.univie.ac.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i3F9lGtc007246; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:47:16 +0200 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:47:16 +0200 From: Markus Mottl To: skaller Cc: caml-list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake Message-ID: <20040415094716.GA7039@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> Mail-Followup-To: skaller , caml-list References: <005e01c421f5$2dd45210$ef01a8c0@warp> <1081943666.20677.685.camel@pelican> <20040414164957.GA24089@tallman.kefka.frap.net> <1081991111.20677.877.camel@pelican> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1081991111.20677.877.camel@pelican> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Miltered: at nez-perce by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 ocamake:01 2004:99 knowles:99 ocamake:01 interscript:01 camlp:01 camlp:01 swig:01 wrappers:01 compiler:01 camlidl:01 handles:01 supported:01 preprocessor:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 374 On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, skaller wrote: > On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 02:49, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > > Just so I don't leave anyone out, I'd say both ocamake and OCamlMakefile handle > > (1) and (3) all at once. > > Yeah? How would they handle Interscript sources? > What about Camlp4? No problem, OCamlMakefile handles them by letting the user specify a preprocessor in a comment in the first line. See camlp4-example in the distribution. > My system also contains *Felix* programs, > since it happens to be a compiler. How do these > make systems handle that? Add new "make"-rules? > What about my use of SWIG to generate wrappers? Look at the way "camlidl" is supported by OCamlMakefile and just add this feature. Regards, Markus -- Markus Mottl http://www.oefai.at/~markus markus@oefai.at ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners