From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA14027; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:36:12 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA13802; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:36:11 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from gatekeeper.elmer.external.excelhustler.com (gatekeeper.excelhustler.com [68.99.114.105]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3NLaAYM015131; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:36:10 +0200 Received: from chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (unknown [192.168.0.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com", Issuer "excelhustler.com" (not verified)) by gatekeeper.elmer.external.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045ECE013F; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:36:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70F05C006; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:36:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wile.internal.excelhustler.com (wile.internal.excelhustler.com [192.168.1.34]) by chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB805C005; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:36:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: by wile.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 96D9E703C; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:36:09 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:36:09 -0500 From: John Goerzen To: Maxence Guesdon Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] The Missing Library Message-ID: <20040423213609.GG6783@excelhustler.com> References: <20040423185148.GA4434@excelhustler.com> <20040423195206.GA27257@tallman.kefka.frap.net> <20040423202342.GA5962@excelhustler.com> <20040423223611.33ef1c08@haddock.max.fr> <20040423211003.GD6783@excelhustler.com> <20040423231204.1576c96b@haddock.max.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20040423231204.1576c96b@haddock.max.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-Scanned-By: clamscan at chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 2004:99 maxence:01 guesdon:01 featureful:01 ocaml:01 caml:01 wrt:01 0200,:01 ecrivait:02 unix:02 thread:02 module:03 wrote:03 library:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 11:12:04PM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote: > Dans son style inimitable, John Goerzen =E9crivait: > > You view it as a problem that some in the OCaml community would like to > > see a more featureful and easy to use standard library? Why? >=20 > This has already been discussed last month, see this thread > http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200404/msg00045.html I checked that message, and several followups down the road, but it appears to be a version control debate followed by some other people that seemed to mostly agree with me wrt the Unix module and getting code into the standard library. Can you provide a more specific reference that develops your point of view more clearly? -- John ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners