From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id AAA18488; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 00:38:44 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA18432 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 00:38:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from calmail-cl.berkeley.edu (mailfarm.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.61.106]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3NMcgYM023933 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2004 00:38:42 +0200 Received: from [64.162.212.212] (HELO tallman.kefka.frap.net) by calmail-cl.berkeley.edu (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with SMTP id 20137972 for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 15:38:38 -0700 Received: by tallman.kefka.frap.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 23 Apr 2004 15:37:24 -0700 Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 15:37:24 -0700 From: Kenneth Knowles To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] The Missing Library Message-ID: <20040423223724.GA27550@tallman.kefka.frap.net> References: <20040423185148.GA4434@excelhustler.com> <20040423204115.GA20626@localhost> <20040423211628.GE6783@excelhustler.com> <20040423222829.GH848@speakeasy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040423222829.GH848@speakeasy.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; knowles:99 caml-list:01 2004:99 -pack:01 namespaces:01 haskell:01 namespaces:01 0700,:01 modules:02 modules:02 o'caml:02 module:03 module:03 dots:03 wrote:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 03:28:29PM -0700, Shawn Wagner wrote: > Insert > standard whine about needing namespace support. Couldn't you just put your modules in a container module via -pack? Why have namespaces in addition to modules? I *would* like to see a simple change to allow dots in module names if possible (I haven't thought much about it)... This is how Haskell makes deep namespaces easier, but I don't think they have the same "open" as O'Caml. Kenn ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners