From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA12598; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:02:55 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA13353 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:02:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from paul.rtelekom.ru (paul.rtelekom.ru [217.146.42.160]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3QC2rjq027117 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 14:02:53 +0200 Received: from paul.rtelekom.ru (paul@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by paul.rtelekom.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3QC2q4m003643 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:02:52 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from paul@paul.rtelekom.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by paul.rtelekom.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i3QC2qmI003642 for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:02:52 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from paul) From: Paul Argentoff Reply-To: argentoff@rtelekom.ru Organization: Ratmir-TeleKom To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] pxp question Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:02:52 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200404261442.12641.argentoff@rtelekom.ru> <1082979041.5143.46.camel@ares> In-Reply-To: <1082979041.5143.46.camel@ares> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404261602.52534.argentoff@rtelekom.ru> X-Miltered: at = by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 pxp:01 2004:99 gerd:01 stolpmann:01 jabber:01 jabber:01 node:02 wrote:03 snippet:04 anyway:05 function:09 i've:09 message:89 think:11 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Monday 26 April 2004 15:30, Gerd Stolpmann wrote: > I think this snippet of code is not enough to see the error. The error > message looks like as if [collectors] is a function, and of course, > [find] expects that it is a node. You are right ;-) I've already found a typo in a line just above the offending piece. Thank for your attention anyway :) -- Yours truly, WBR, Paul Argentoff. Jabber: paul@jabber.rtelekom.ru RIPE: PA1291-RIPE ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners