From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA16294; Fri, 7 May 2004 17:40:02 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA23839 for ; Fri, 7 May 2004 17:40:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from aomori.annexia.org (annexia.force9.co.uk [212.56.101.183]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i47Fe1SH023997 for ; Fri, 7 May 2004 17:40:01 +0200 Received: from rich by aomori.annexia.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BM7SC-0005yf-00 for ; Fri, 07 May 2004 16:40:00 +0100 Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 16:40:00 +0100 Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml development site Message-ID: <20040507154000.GA22848@redhat.com> References: <20040507.124419.02551989.Christophe.Troestler@umh.ac.be> <008501c43429$393dc730$ef01a8c0@warp> <20040507145333.GB28061@excelhustler.com> <00cd01c43445$02e5aa10$ef01a8c0@warp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00cd01c43445$02e5aa10$ef01a8c0@warp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Richard Jones X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 409BADD1.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 2004:99 cannasse:01 sourceforge:01 sourceforge:01 ltd:98 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 caml:01 nicolas:01 0200,:01 raises:01 wrote:03 perl:03 mailling:95 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 05:07:27PM +0200, Nicolas Cannasse wrote: > I think you didn't understood my point. I said that the OCaml community > maybe doesn't need a full-featured SourceForge yet, and that's a mailling > list and CVS server is more easy to setup and manage, and would be enough - > maybe I'm wrong... I wasn't at all thinking that we need to develop our own > SourceForge (or whatever). There was no question of actually developing any software. All we would do is 'apt-get -t testing gforge'. The issue that John raises of how much ongoing maintenance is required for such an enterprise is of more importance though. Rich. -- Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://www.j-london.com/ Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - improving website return on investment Learning Objective CAML for C, C++, Perl and Java programmers: http://www.merjis.com/richj/computers/ocaml/tutorial/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners