From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA23863; Thu, 20 May 2004 23:05:43 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA23846 for ; Thu, 20 May 2004 23:05:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net (ptb-relay02.plus.net [212.159.14.213]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4KL5fEV027549 for ; Thu, 20 May 2004 23:05:42 +0200 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=chetara) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BQujV-000Exn-La for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 20 May 2004 21:05:41 +0000 From: Jon Harrop Organization: University of Cambridge To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Large projects in OCaml Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 22:04:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040519172442.30413.qmail@web14522.mail.yahoo.com> <200405201837.25278.jdh30@cam.ac.uk> <7BF7E098-AA9C-11D8-A7CF-000A95A1E69A@csun.edu> In-Reply-To: <7BF7E098-AA9C-11D8-A7CF-000A95A1E69A@csun.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200405202204.27693.jdh30@cam.ac.uk> X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 40AD1DA5.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 2004:99 immune:99 mylib:01 inconsistent:01 ocaml:01 blah:01 blah:01 linking:02 linking:02 patches:02 wrote:03 interface:03 library:03 dynamic:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Thursday 20 May 2004 21:30, Eric Stokes wrote: > ... > No, that is the case with dynamic linking, not static linking. The only > issue with > static linking and commercial stuff is that your patches are likely to > be much bigger. > However the good thing about it is that your code is fairly immune to > dynamic library > changes on the client machine. Would my users not keep getting unavoidable "The files blah.cmi and mylib.cmi make inconsistent assumptions over interface Blah"? Cheers, Jon. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners