caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacques GARRIGUE <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To: jdh30@cam.ac.uk
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Large projects in OCaml
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 12:07:03 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040524.120703.46614549.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200405211228.34673.jdh30@cam.ac.uk>

From: Jon Harrop <jdh30@cam.ac.uk>

> On Thursday 20 May 2004 22:41, you wrote:
> > ...There is no link phase (except linking
> > to external c libraries) at the start of an Ocaml program.
> 
> Sure, so if someone buys my lib (in the form of .cmo and .mli files), writes 
> their own code and compiles it into an executable then it should work 
> forever.
> 
> But I want them to be able to constantly write new code and recompile it 
> (statically linking their .cmo files with mine), forever. If their code and 
> my lib depend upon the same object file and it changes, then this will break 
> and the only fix will be for them to get a new lib from me for the new 
> version of their object file. If I am right, then I am afraid that this will 
> put people off...

There has been some discussion about how bad it is, but my view is
that this .cmi/.cmx compatibility problem is so bad that it makes
binary only distribution of libraries a nightmare for both the
provider and the user. Basically, any bug fix in the compiler (not
even a new feature) may break the compatibility.
If you are going to make binary only distribution, then you should
guarantee to your user that you are ready to provide them new versions
when needed. A terrible pain for both of you.
(At some time Ensemble was binary-only for licensing reasons. It was a
huge discomfort.)

Honestly, what is so bad about providing the source under a NDA?
This has been the standard way to proceed on Unix for a long time,
just because people may need to patch and fix the system, and you
don't wan't to have to go to your provider every time something
changes.
I suggest you rather think in that direction, since it would save you
lots of trouble.

Jacques Garrigue

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-24  3:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-19 17:24 ramu ramamurthy
2004-05-19 21:33 ` Jon Harrop
2004-05-19 23:04   ` David J. Trombley
2004-05-20 16:31   ` Eric Stokes
2004-05-20 17:37     ` Jon Harrop
2004-05-20 20:30       ` Eric Stokes
2004-05-20 21:04         ` Jon Harrop
2004-05-20 21:41           ` Eric Stokes
2004-05-21 11:28             ` Jon Harrop
2004-05-21 12:49               ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2004-05-21 16:27                 ` Jon Harrop
2004-05-24  3:07               ` Jacques GARRIGUE [this message]
2004-05-24  5:20                 ` skaller
2004-05-24 12:14                   ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2004-05-24 13:54                     ` skaller
2004-05-24 14:20                       ` Xavier Leroy
2004-05-24 16:48                         ` Alex Baretta
2004-05-24 17:38                           ` brogoff
2004-05-25  5:25                           ` Alan Schmitt
2004-05-24 19:24                         ` skaller
2004-05-24 19:52                           ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-05-24 14:20                       ` Daniel Bünzli
2004-05-24 19:34                         ` skaller
2004-05-24 16:49                       ` james woodyatt
2004-05-19 21:38 ` Richard Jones
2004-05-20  8:46   ` skaller
2004-05-20 11:56     ` [Caml-list] A problem with nan sejourne kevin
2004-05-20 20:42       ` Jon Harrop
2004-05-20 22:24         ` David J. Trombley
2004-05-20 22:45         ` Damien Doligez
2004-05-20 13:10     ` [Caml-list] Large projects in OCaml Jon Harrop
2004-05-20 16:23       ` skaller
2004-05-20  6:35 ` David Monniaux
2004-05-20  7:17   ` Dustin Sallings
2004-05-25  7:26 Mattias Waldau
2004-05-25 19:07 ` Richard Jones
2004-05-25 19:54   ` Evan Martin
2004-05-26  6:57   ` skaller
2004-05-26  8:09     ` Richard Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040524.120703.46614549.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
    --to=garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=jdh30@cam.ac.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).