From: Eray Ozkural <exa@kablonet.com.tr>
To: ronniec95@lineone.net
Cc: "caml" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Efficient C++ interfacing?
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 19:45:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200406051945.14906.exa@kablonet.com.tr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40800C10000A6ABC@mk-cpfrontend-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com>
On Sunday 30 May 2004 14:47, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've done a fair amount of C interfacing with Ocaml. Although the
> auto-conversion tools are ok, it's usually simpler (and definitely faster
> in terms of performance) to roll your own I've found. And it's actually not
> that complicated for most things.
>
> Also with handrolling your own interface you'll get something that is more
> ocaml like and makes more sense (from a usability perspective) than auto
> generated ones most of the time. This is from my experience only, and YMMV.
What if we would like to generate bindings for a huge moving target like Qt or
KDE libraries? It would take an inordinate amount of time to update such
bindings manually. Do you suggest that SWIG sucks as far as ocaml goes?
Best Regards,
--
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara KDE Project: http://www.kde.org
http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo Malfunction: http://malfunct.iuma.com
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-05 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-30 7:41 Brandon J. Van Every
2004-05-30 11:47 ` ronniec95
2004-05-30 20:17 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-06-05 16:45 ` Eray Ozkural [this message]
2004-06-05 19:07 ` skaller
2004-06-06 0:31 ` Eray Ozkural
2004-06-06 3:33 ` John Goerzen
2004-06-06 7:00 ` skaller
2004-06-06 16:02 ` David Fox
2004-06-06 18:44 ` Eray Ozkural
2004-06-06 20:41 ` skaller
2004-06-07 3:04 ` Eray Ozkural
2004-06-07 7:41 ` Benjamin Geer
2004-06-07 13:38 ` Eray Ozkural
2004-06-07 14:18 ` Basile Starynkevitch local
2004-06-07 14:29 ` Eray Ozkural
2004-06-07 16:29 ` Eray Ozkural
2004-06-07 15:46 ` skaller
2004-06-06 16:00 ` David Fox
2004-06-05 21:39 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-06-06 16:18 ` David Fox
2004-06-06 18:47 ` Eray Ozkural
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200406051945.14906.exa@kablonet.com.tr \
--to=exa@kablonet.com.tr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr \
--cc=ronniec95@lineone.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).