Re: [Caml-list] Efficient C++ interfacing?

[Eray Ozkural <exa@kablonet.com.tr>]

On Sunday 06 June 2004 19:18, David Fox wrote:
> Unfortunately, those bindings are over three years old, and despite the
> claim of being generated automatically, are continually becoming stale
> and rarely work.  There are now tools called "Kalyptus"and "Smoke" in
> the kdebindings module of the kde.org CVS server, which is used to
> generate several language bindings, none of which is C, but one of which
> is Smoke.  In the smoke directory it looks like there are now
> conversions for both Qt and KDE.  So maybe the pieces are all there now.
>

Yes, the smoke lib is favored among kdebindings developers. They too wish to 
eliminate the manual labor that was needed before to patch the C libs... I 
wonder how well the python bindings perform right now. Python too is a quite 
high level language.

Regards,

-- 
Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara  KDE Project: http://www.kde.org
http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo  Malfunction: http://malfunct.iuma.com
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B  EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners