From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA15811; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 20:49:43 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA15801 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 20:49:42 +0200 (MET DST) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from eposta.kablonet.com.tr ([62.248.102.66]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i56IneSH007757 for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 20:49:40 +0200 Received: (qmail 93796 invoked by uid 1007); 6 Jun 2004 18:58:29 -0000 Received: from exa@kablonet.com.tr by eposta.kablonet.com.tr by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (clamdscan: 0.70-rc. Clear:RC:0(81.214.24.132):. Processed in 5.607511 secs); 06 Jun 2004 18:58:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orion) (exa@kablonet.com.tr@81.214.24.132) by 0 with SMTP; 6 Jun 2004 18:58:23 -0000 From: Eray Ozkural Reply-To: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr Organization: Bilkent University CS Dept. To: David Fox Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Efficient C++ interfacing? Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 21:47:52 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.51 Cc: caml , "Brandon J. Van Every" References: <40C343D7.1030009@lindows.com> In-Reply-To: <40C343D7.1030009@lindows.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406062147.52259.exa@kablonet.com.tr> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 40C36744.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; eray:01 ozkural:01 caml-list:01 interfacing:01 2004:99 kde:01 kde:01 libs:01 python:01 python:01 eray:01 ozkural:01 erayo:01 bilkent:01 bilkent:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Sunday 06 June 2004 19:18, David Fox wrote: > Unfortunately, those bindings are over three years old, and despite the > claim of being generated automatically, are continually becoming stale > and rarely work. There are now tools called "Kalyptus"and "Smoke" in > the kdebindings module of the kde.org CVS server, which is used to > generate several language bindings, none of which is C, but one of which > is Smoke. In the smoke directory it looks like there are now > conversions for both Qt and KDE. So maybe the pieces are all there now. > Yes, the smoke lib is favored among kdebindings developers. They too wish to eliminate the manual labor that was needed before to patch the C libs... I wonder how well the python bindings perform right now. Python too is a quite high level language. Regards, -- Eray Ozkural (exa) Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara KDE Project: http://www.kde.org http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo Malfunction: http://malfunct.iuma.com GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners