From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA31641; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:38:28 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA31672 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:38:26 +0200 (MET DST) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from eposta.kablonet.com.tr ([62.248.102.66]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i57DcOSH007461 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:38:25 +0200 Received: (qmail 85073 invoked by uid 1007); 7 Jun 2004 13:47:12 -0000 Received: from exa@kablonet.com.tr by eposta.kablonet.com.tr by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (clamdscan: 0.70-rc. Clear:RC:0(81.214.24.132):. Processed in 0.201376 secs); 07 Jun 2004 13:47:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orion) (exa@kablonet.com.tr@81.214.24.132) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Jun 2004 13:47:12 -0000 From: Eray Ozkural Reply-To: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr Organization: Bilkent University CS Dept. To: Benjamin Geer Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Efficient C++ interfacing? Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:38:06 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.51 References: <40800C10000A6ABC@mk-cpfrontend-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com> <200406070604.39686.exa@kablonet.com.tr> <40C41C17.8030400@socialtools.net> In-Reply-To: <40C41C17.8030400@socialtools.net> Cc: caml-list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406071638.06439.exa@kablonet.com.tr> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 40C46FD0.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; eray:01 ozkural:01 caml-list:01 interfacing:01 2004:99 eray:01 ozkural:01 bison:01 antlr:01 antlr:01 erayo:01 bilkent:01 bilkent:01 ankara:01 kde:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Monday 07 June 2004 10:41, you wrote: > Eray Ozkural wrote: > > g++ was still using the old bison thing; they were talking about writing > > a parser from scratch. I haven't followed the developments lately, > > though. > > The C++ parser in g++ was rewritten as a handcrafted, top-down parser; I > think work on it was completed last year or the year before. If you would compare the top-down parser in g++ and ANTLR C++ grammar (2003 release on www.antlr.org), which would be easier to work with for writing a translator that needs type analysis? g++ is still written in C, so I guess it'd be harder to extract anything useful. Best Regards, -- Eray Ozkural (exa) Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara KDE Project: http://www.kde.org http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo Malfunction: http://malfunct.iuma.com GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners