From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA21694; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:52:20 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA28936 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:52:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5L7qISH000388; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:52:18 +0200 Received: from bourg.inria.fr (bourg.inria.fr [128.93.11.100]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA28925; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:52:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from basile by bourg.inria.fr with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BcJal-0007gP-VU; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:51:47 +0200 Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:51:47 +0200 To: James Leifer Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] mod_caml's bytecode restriction due to Apache or just CGI dyn'linking? Message-ID: <20040621075147.GA29516@bourg.inria.fr> References: <20040621044642.GA28285@bourg.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i From: "Basile Starynkevitch [local]" X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 40D693B2.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 caml's:01 basile:01 basile:01 2004:99 shameless:01 mimic:01 misfeature:01 debugger:01 bytecodes:01 cristal:01 cristal:01 cmo:01 debug:01 ocaml:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 09:33:23AM +0200, James Leifer wrote: > "Basile Starynkevitch [local]" writes: > > > Sorry for the shameless plug - but I think that ocamljit can be used > > to accelerate a bit such Ocaml propulsed web pages. > > So, ocamljit plays well with dynamic .cmo linking? Yes, it was designed to mimic as much as possible the bytecode interpreter. The main misfeature of ocamljit is lack of [ocaml] debugger support - because the few debug related bytecodes are not supported by it (in the case yu run into them, you got a loud fatal error!) -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH -- basile dot starynkevitch at inria dot fr Project cristal.inria.fr - phone +33 1 3963 5197 - mobile 6 8501 2359 http://cristal.inria.fr/~starynke --- all opinions are only mine ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners