From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA10975; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:17:45 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA11647 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:17:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net (ptb-relay03.plus.net [212.159.14.214]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5RKHhSH024148 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 22:17:43 +0200 Received: from [80.229.56.224] (helo=chetara) by ptb-relay03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1Beg5u-000GHG-NQ for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:17:42 +0000 From: Jon Harrop To: caml-list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] file close bug? Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:15:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <1088353277.32642.28.camel@pelican.wigram> <20040627190417.GA22473@force.stwing.upenn.edu> <1088365375.18587.15.camel@pelican.wigram> In-Reply-To: <1088365375.18587.15.camel@pelican.wigram> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406272115.39422.postmaster@jdh30.plus.com> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 40DF2B67.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; postmaster:99 caml-list:01 bug:01 2004:99 bignums:01 marshalling:01 hashtable:01 nums:01 nums:01 hashed:01 marshal:01 wrote:03 functions:05 functional:06 cheers:06 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Sunday 27 June 2004 20:42, skaller wrote: > ... > I wrapped the bignums in a class just to get a comparable id. > Now I can't marshal it :( Unless you're marshalling a hashtable of big nums, can you not just wrap the big nums in a class temporarily while they're being hashed? Incidentally, is it possible to flag to these kinds of functions that you want them to skip functional values rather than bail on them? Cheers, Jon. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners