From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA10955; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:34:46 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA10952 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:34:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de (hirsch.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.6]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5T7YhEV024177 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:34:43 +0200 X-Envelope-From: postmaster@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from hirsch.in-berlin.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) with ESMTP id i5T7YhNQ024388 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:34:43 +0200 Received: (from www-data@localhost) by hirsch.in-berlin.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) id i5T7YhmE024387; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:34:43 +0200 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:34:43 +0200 Message-Id: <200406290734.i5T7YhmE024387@hirsch.in-berlin.de> X-Authentication-Warning: hirsch.in-berlin.de: www-data set sender to postmaster@first.in-berlin.de using -f From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de To: caml-list@inria.fr X-Sender: postmaster@first.in-berlin.de X-Mailer: UUCP WebMail - IN-Berlin e.V. References: <20040616032612.GA23426@complete.org> In-Reply-To: <20040616032612.GA23426@complete.org> Subject: [Caml-list] Startconditions in ocamllex Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 40E11B93.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; oliver:01 in-berlin:01 implemented:01 implemented:01 oliver:01 syntax:02 ciao:02 lex:04 lex:04 ocamllex:05 ocamllex:05 documented:07 feature:07 i'm:07 hello:15 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hello, in the original lex it is possible to use startconditions. Is that possible in ocamllex too? There is no description of start conditions in the ocamllex-section of the Ocaml-manual. So I'm not sure if that feature is implemented and not documented, or if it is not implemented. And: which syntax to use? Is it the same like in lex? Ciao, Oliver ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners