From: Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr>
To: Evgeny Chukreev <sjah@land.ru>
Cc: "Basile Starynkevitch [local]" <basile.starynkevitch@inria.fr>,
caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Does Caml have slow arithmetics ?
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 16:58:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040707145803.GB27498@yquem.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m31xjngbsp.fsf@jah.m12.ru>
> Do developers plan to add new kinds of optimization in a near future?
>
> Trivial example:
>
> let f a b =
> let a, b = a, b in
> a + b
>
> let g a b =
> a + b
The main purpose of OCaml's compiler optimizations is to avoid
introducing inefficiencies while compiling. In other terms, the main
objective is to generate good machine code from good source code.
In this respect, optimizations of redundant tagging operations is
crucial, since this aspect of execution is not apparent in the source
code. Other examples include register allocation and instruction
selection, which are not under the programmer's control
On the other hand, reducing inefficiencies already present in the
source code isn't a priority. In your "f" function, you asked for the
construction of a pair, and you get that pair construction in
ocamlopt's output. If you didn't want the pair to be constructed, why
did you write "f" this way?
- Xavier Leroy
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-07 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-07 6:45 Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2004-07-07 8:14 ` Richard Jones
2004-07-07 9:13 ` Basile Starynkevitch [local]
2004-07-07 12:32 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2004-07-07 13:00 ` Basile Starynkevitch [local]
2004-07-07 15:09 ` Olivier Pérès
2004-07-07 17:06 ` David Brown
2004-07-07 17:43 ` Olivier Pérès
2004-07-08 3:40 ` David Brown
2004-07-08 11:06 ` Olivier Pérès
2004-07-07 13:06 ` Richard Jones
2004-07-07 13:22 ` David Haguenauer
2004-07-07 15:48 ` Brian Hurt
2004-07-07 13:57 ` Evgeny Chukreev
2004-07-07 14:58 ` Xavier Leroy [this message]
2004-07-07 15:48 ` Evgeny Chukreev
2004-07-07 19:16 ` skaller
2004-07-08 3:44 ` David Brown
2004-07-08 5:50 ` skaller
2004-07-08 9:51 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-07-08 12:03 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2004-07-08 14:04 ` David Brown
2004-07-08 14:36 ` Luc Maranget
2004-07-08 15:11 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-08 15:49 ` Luc Maranget
2004-07-09 14:06 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-09 16:20 ` Markus Mottl
[not found] ` <Luc.Maranget@inria.fr>
2004-07-09 17:54 ` Norman Ramsey
2004-07-12 8:08 ` Luc Maranget
2004-07-08 15:51 ` Markus Mottl
2004-07-08 18:27 ` skaller
2004-07-08 21:14 ` [Caml-list] tail recursion and register poor Intel architecture Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-08 21:35 ` Brian Hurt
2004-07-08 23:01 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-09 4:36 ` Brian Hurt
2004-07-09 6:53 ` Florian Hars
2004-07-09 14:44 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-09 6:55 ` skaller
2004-07-09 14:45 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-09 16:09 ` skaller
2004-07-10 9:19 ` [Caml-list] embedded OCaml Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-11 23:11 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-12 7:39 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-12 14:04 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-12 18:48 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-12 23:22 ` Richard Jones
2004-07-13 6:39 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-13 8:47 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-13 8:58 ` Benjamin Geer
2004-07-13 9:47 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-13 9:18 ` Damien Doligez
2004-07-13 9:56 ` [Caml-list] OCaml as business model Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-13 9:59 ` Richard Jones
2004-07-13 10:50 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-13 11:20 ` Damien Doligez
2004-07-13 12:01 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-07-14 8:05 ` [Caml-list] embedded OCaml I R T
2004-07-12 10:25 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2004-07-13 7:06 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-08 17:12 ` Tail calls (Was Re: [Caml-list] Does Caml have slow arithmetics ?) brogoff
2004-07-08 17:23 ` Richard Jones
2004-07-12 17:07 ` Xavier Leroy
2004-07-12 21:13 ` skaller
2004-07-13 7:20 ` Xavier Leroy
2004-07-08 15:00 ` [Caml-list] Does Caml have slow arithmetics ? Brian Hurt
2004-07-08 13:30 ` Alex Baretta
2004-07-07 21:26 ` Jon Harrop
2004-07-08 5:05 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040707145803.GB27498@yquem.inria.fr \
--to=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
--cc=basile.starynkevitch@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=sjah@land.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).