caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacques GARRIGUE <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To: rich@annexia.org
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Optional and mandatory labels with the same name in the same function ?
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 23:49:07 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040715.234907.125102370.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040715142305.GA14257@redhat.com>

From: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>

> It's a bit more subtle than that.  OCaml 3.07 always picks the last
> argument, and ignores the others.  Thus:
> 
> # let f x x = x;;
> val f : 'a -> 'b -> 'b = <fun>
> # let f x x x x = x;;
> val f : 'a -> 'b -> 'c -> 'd -> 'd = <fun>
> 
> But a future version might pick the first argument, or one in the
> middle, or one at random.  I can't find any guarantee in the manual
> that the behaviour won't change, so this might cause a bug.

Well, it's not directly related to the question I was answering, but I
can reassure you. This behaviour is well defined, because
  let f x x = x
is no more than a shorthand for
  let f = fun x -> fun x -> x
which is quite natural for anybody versed in lambda-calculus.
I cannot cite you whre the manual specifies that, but this not a case
of undefined behaviour.

More generally, ocaml may leave some runtime behaviour unspecified,
but the static behaviour (type-checking) is expected to be fully
specified.

Jacques Garrigue

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


      reply	other threads:[~2004-07-15 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-15 11:54 Berke Durak
2004-07-15 14:11 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2004-07-15 14:23   ` Richard Jones
2004-07-15 14:49     ` Jacques GARRIGUE [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040715.234907.125102370.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
    --to=garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=rich@annexia.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).