From: William Lovas <wlovas@stwing.upenn.edu>
To: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: lazyness in ocaml (was : [Caml-list] kprintf with user formatters)
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 23:32:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040723033244.GA296@force.stwing.upenn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1090537249.5870.168.camel@pelican.wigram>
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 09:00:49AM +1000, skaller wrote:
> How about sugar:
>
> \(expr) <==> lazy expr
>
> Since arguments to be lazily evaluated are never variables,
> they're often going to be surrounded in brackets already,
> and so this is only a single character ..
> a lazy way to spell lazy .. and a very easy implementation :)
... and this is a lot like Okasaki's $ proposal, also mentioned in Wadler's
paper on lazy notation in strict languages[1]. There really is nothing new
under the sun :)
William
[1] http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/lazyinstrict/lazyinstrict.txt
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-23 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-30 16:32 [Caml-list] kprintf with user formatters Damien
2004-07-14 21:10 ` Pierre Weis
2004-07-15 0:17 ` Markus Mottl
2004-07-15 7:30 ` David MENTRE
2004-07-15 7:59 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2004-07-15 23:35 ` henri dubois-ferriere
2004-07-15 7:39 ` Damien
2004-07-15 12:19 ` Markus Mottl
2004-07-15 12:42 ` Basile Starynkevitch [local]
2004-07-15 13:45 ` Markus Mottl
2004-07-15 14:22 ` Basile Starynkevitch [local]
2004-07-15 14:57 ` Markus Mottl
2004-07-16 6:47 ` Pierre Weis
2004-07-16 7:13 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2004-07-16 7:23 ` henri dubois-ferriere
2004-07-16 7:44 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2004-07-16 17:56 ` Markus Mottl
2004-07-19 9:17 ` Pierre Weis
2004-07-19 9:32 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2004-07-16 7:21 ` henri dubois-ferriere
2004-07-16 17:44 ` Markus Mottl
2004-07-19 10:10 ` Pierre Weis
2004-07-19 10:43 ` Jon Harrop
2004-07-21 15:52 ` Pierre Weis
2004-07-21 17:43 ` lazyness in ocaml (was : [Caml-list] kprintf with user formatters) Daniel Bünzli
2004-07-22 16:28 ` Pierre Weis
2004-07-22 17:03 ` William Lovas
2004-07-22 23:00 ` skaller
2004-07-23 3:32 ` William Lovas [this message]
2004-07-28 7:26 ` Pierre Weis
2004-07-28 8:06 ` skaller
2004-07-28 8:29 ` Daniel Bünzli
2004-07-28 9:13 ` Pierre Weis
2004-07-28 9:36 ` skaller
2004-07-28 9:38 ` skaller
2004-07-28 10:17 ` Jason Smith
2004-07-28 12:31 ` skaller
2004-07-21 20:41 ` [Caml-list] kprintf with user formatters Jon Harrop
2004-07-22 15:39 ` Pierre Weis
2004-07-22 22:16 ` [Caml-list] lazy evaluation: [Was: kprintf with user formatters] skaller
2004-07-22 22:42 ` [Caml-list] kprintf with user formatters skaller
2004-07-22 8:05 ` [Caml-list] wait instruction lehalle@miriad
2004-07-22 8:40 ` Olivier Andrieu
2004-07-22 10:35 ` lehalle@miriad
2004-07-22 10:33 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-07-16 6:17 ` [Caml-list] kprintf with user formatters Pierre Weis
2004-07-16 17:14 ` Markus Mottl
2004-07-19 10:00 ` Pierre Weis
2004-07-16 6:02 ` Pierre Weis
2004-07-16 8:42 ` Damien
2004-07-19 9:00 ` Pierre Weis
2004-07-16 16:52 ` Markus Mottl
2004-07-19 9:28 ` Pierre Weis
2004-07-15 22:20 ` Pierre Weis
2004-07-15 23:01 ` Markus Mottl
2004-07-16 16:17 ` james woodyatt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040723033244.GA296@force.stwing.upenn.edu \
--to=wlovas@stwing.upenn.edu \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).