From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA09809; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:03:58 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA10630 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:03:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.16]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6QG3uSH015758 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:03:56 +0200 Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.193.117.156]) by parsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:01:40 +0200 Received: from lat4148.rd.francetelecom.com ([10.193.6.100]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:01:40 +0200 Received: by lat4148.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix, from userid 1014) id EFA7670177; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:01:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:01:39 +0200 From: Cuihtlauac ALVARADO To: Vitaly Lugovsky Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CamlP4 bug, 3.08.0 Message-ID: <20040726160139.GA17634@rd.francetelecom.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: France Telecom - R&D - MAPS/AST X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2004 16:01:40.0167 (UTC) FILETIME=[D66F0570:01C47329] X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 41052B6C.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; cuihtlauac:01 alvarado:01 cuihtlauac:01 alvarado:01 caml-list:01 camlp:01 bug:01 otags:01 2004:99 0400,:01 vitaly:01 lugovsky:01 renders:01 camlp:01 bug:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk We have such code in Otags (we needed linenumbers and co in the tags files), I'm working on a port for ocaml 3.08.0 I'll try to make this library stand alone. On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 02:02:42PM +0400, Vitaly Lugovsky wrote: > > Changes in the Lexing.loc definition renders the CamlP4 wide > usage of Stream.count obsolete. But: there is no standard way to > convert int -> loc, and it would be quite a pain to convert all > the files currently using Stream.count. Is there anybody working > on this problem already? > > > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners -- Cuihtlauac ALVARADO - France Telecom - R&D - +33296053273 2, av Pierre Marzin - 22307 Lannion - France ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners