From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id CAA17534; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 02:31:30 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA17456 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 02:31:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i7B0VSmL001002 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 02:31:28 +0200 Received: (qmail 7629 invoked by uid 65534); 11 Aug 2004 00:31:27 -0000 Received: from pD9530E4D.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO pd9530e4d.dip.t-dialin.net) (217.83.14.77) by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 11 Aug 2004 02:31:27 +0200 X-Authenticated: #20477425 From: Micha To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] stream parser problem/question Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 02:35:27 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200408101152.17727.micha-1@fantasymail.de> <200408110022.46427.micha-1@fantasymail.de> <41194E51.8050007@ens-lyon.fr> In-Reply-To: <41194E51.8050007@ens-lyon.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200408110235.27127.micha-1@fantasymail.de> X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 411968E0.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; micha:01 caml-list:01 2004:99 compiler:01 compiler:01 typechecking:01 variants:01 variants:01 token:01 schrieb:01 parser:02 slightly:03 types:03 types:03 wondering:04 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Am Wednesday 11 August 2004 00:38 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Rouquier: > OK > Here is a code sample, then. thanks for the sample code, I will review it, tomorrow (or today :-) > If the two queues have different token types, it will allow slightly > better typechecking... yes thats the case. I was wondering if the `(polymorhic) variants would help not to have that much types for the variants > Ah yes. I didn't had the time to submit anything, but I'll look at it > again and again. I'm only interested in the lightening division since I > hate sacrificing my sleeping time. yes, nice try :-) > Did you send somehting ? The idea was really funny. I spent too much time for the compiler and too less time for a genius ant :-) We send two ants, but the good ideas came afterwards, as usual :-) There are still some private ant-contests going on, and someone announced a ant which could not be beaten (he said)... I'll try to write a ant, just to see what my compiler generates .... cheers Michael ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners