From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA19874; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:59:27 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA20252 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:59:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from a.mx.polytechnique.org (a.mx.polytechnique.org [129.104.30.34]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7EAxPmL029127 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:59:25 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by djali.m4x.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CCB3329F for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:59:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from djali.m4x.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (djali [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 25305-01 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:59:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from charm.inrialpes.fr (alan-schm1p.inria.fr [128.93.20.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ssl.polytechnique.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361C533293 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:59:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by charm.inrialpes.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F01E238483F; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 10:52:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 10:52:04 +0200 From: Alan Schmitt To: Ocaml Mailing List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CFG's and OCaml Message-ID: <20040814085204.GL7901@alan-schm1p> Mail-Followup-To: Ocaml Mailing List References: <200408140125.59473.jon@jdh30.plus.com> <20040814105751.22099f53.ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7kgF7nVBI97QWIGi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040814105751.22099f53.ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com> X-Editor: Vim http://vim.sf.net/ X-Info: http://pauillac.inria.fr/~aschmitt/ X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.7-gentoo-r11 (i686) X-Uptime: 10:50:19 up 2 days, 18:18, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.12, 0.16 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 411DF08D.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 2004:99 lalr:01 ocaml:01 parsers:03 wrote:03 wrote:03 lex:04 lex:04 parse:04 parse:04 seems:05 aug:05 erik:06 maybe:06 X-Attachments: type="application/pgp-signature" Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk --7kgF7nVBI97QWIGi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Erik de Castro Lopo (ocaml-erikd@mega-nerd.com) wrote: > On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 01:25:59 +0100 > Jon Harrop wrote: > >=20 > > 1. Are most programming languages designed to be implementable using=20 > > lex and yacc? >=20 > Maybe not lex and yacc, but most are designed to be parsed by=20 > LALR(1) parsers. >=20 > Currently the most difficult to parse language seems to be C++. I vote for TeX as the most difficult language to lex and parse. Alan Schmitt --=20 The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen. =2EO. =2E.O OOO --7kgF7nVBI97QWIGi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBHdK0NIAqM4hFUWgRAoL4AKCgJg6cvewir04w/l1HhQuM9NjuAQCfZ1Qe CHu9TOMD+vvJmqq76EZjvSo= =uA0h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7kgF7nVBI97QWIGi-- ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners