From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA28577; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:14:36 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA28894 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:14:35 +0200 (MET DST) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from gatekeeper.elmer.external.excelhustler.com (gatekeeper.excelhustler.com [68.99.114.105]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i7PGEXfR031774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:14:34 +0200 Received: from chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (unknown [192.168.0.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com", Issuer "excelhustler.com" (not verified)) by gatekeeper.elmer.external.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2162EC0AF; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:14:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0DEC003F; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:14:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com ([192.168.0.12]) by localhost (chatterbox [192.168.0.12]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 15050-02; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:14:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wile.internal.excelhustler.com (wile.internal.excelhustler.com [192.168.1.34]) by chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443C6EC0AA; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:14:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: by wile.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3D0693A0B6; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:14:31 -0500 (CDT) From: John Goerzen To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Alternative Bytecodes for OCaml Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:14:30 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Cc: Jason Smith References: <200408250926.28629.jgoerzen@complete.org> <4d029f7e040825075515b7711c@mail.gmail.com> <009401c48ab5$0f371bc0$b509b584@Praxis> In-Reply-To: <009401c48ab5$0f371bc0$b509b584@Praxis> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200408251114.31040.jgoerzen@complete.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at excelhustler.com X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 412CBAE9.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 bytecodes:01 2004:99 fsharp:01 model:01 ocaml:01 wrote:03 partial:03 compilation:04 unusable:04 stuff:05 guess:06 i'd:06 i'd:06 i'm:07 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Wednesday 25 August 2004 10:06 am, Jason Smith wrote: > > I guess one can always mention F# in this context. > > > > http://research.microsoft.com/projects/ilx/fsharp.aspx > > Yes I was just going to bring that up. I'd be interested in knowing > if they target the same ILX instruction set that F# does. If not, I'd > like to find out there compilation model, e.g. how they deal with > partial applications etc.. I took a look at F#, but unfortunately its license means that it will be unusable for the stuff I'm working on. -- John ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners