From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA20335; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:04:55 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA21199 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:04:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.184]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i7QG4sP0015490 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:04:54 +0200 Received: from [212.227.126.206] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1C0Mk9-0005J4-00 for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:04:53 +0200 Received: from [217.81.33.160] (helo=luki.dobrek.de) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1C0Mk9-0007I8-00 for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:04:53 +0200 Received: by luki.dobrek.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5650AF4E2; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:04:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:04:52 +0200 From: =?unknown-8bit?Q?=A3ukasz?= Dobrek To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Alternative Bytecodes for OCaml Message-ID: <20040826160452.GA29449@luki.dobrek> Reply-To: =?unknown-8bit?Q?=A3ukasz?= Dobrek References: <200408250926.28629.jgoerzen@complete.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408250926.28629.jgoerzen@complete.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:aeb87c022eeb88c823923e0fd302f29a X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 412E0A26.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 bytecodes:01 2004:99 ocamlc:01 ocamlrun:01 lukasz:01 inefficient:01 profile:98 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 garbage:01 bytecode:01 bytecode:01 compile:02 compile:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 09:26:28AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > I see several possibilities with both of those paths: > > * An ocamlc/ocamlrun that execute under Java or .NET and compile/run > normal OCaml bytecode > > * An ocamlopt-equivolent that would compile OCaml code directly to Java > or .NET bytecode Here, I guess, the garbage collector for languages like Java, will be very inefficient with ocaml, and other way around. I don't know Java so well nor .NET but ML languages tend to have very different profile of memory usage than languages like Java or C#. best regards Lukasz Dobrek ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners