From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id BAA17115; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 01:38:43 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA18040 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 01:38:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from smtp.mbg.ocn.ne.jp (mbg.ocn.ne.jp [210.190.142.181]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i7RNcfhO003749 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 01:38:42 +0200 Received: from localhost (p2126-adsau07doujib4-acca.osaka.ocn.ne.jp [220.106.229.126]) by smtp.mbg.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DBF7047; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 08:38:40 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 08:38:35 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040828.083835.21913928.yoriyuki@mbg.ocn.ne.jp> To: rich@annexia.org Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Alternative Bytecodes for OCaml From: Yamagata Yoriyuki In-Reply-To: <20040827221801.GB1545@annexia.org> References: <004f01c48c19$9950d8e0$0100a8c0@warp> <412F9059.2080808@orcaware.com> <20040827221801.GB1545@annexia.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 412FC601.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 bytecodes:01 yamagata:01 yoriyuki:01 yoriyuki:01 caml-list:01 bytecodes:01 2004:99 faq:01 pdd:99 pdd:99 yamagata:01 compiler:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk From: Richard Jones Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Alternative Bytecodes for OCaml Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 23:18:01 +0100 > More about Parrot & garbage collection, > although I'm still not sure if Parrot will do "proper" GC, or use > reference counting: I only have looked documents in http://www.parrotcode.org, but they indicates it will not use ref-counting. "You're not using reference counting. Why not?" in http://www.parrotcode.org/faq/ The doc is somewhat vague, but Parrot seems to use conservative mark&sweep GC. http://www.parrotcode.org/docs/pdd/pdd09_gc.html There are a lot of people in academia in this list. Maybe OCaml->Parrot compiler is a good project for undergraduates? -- Yamagata Yoriyuki ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners