From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA14146; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:43:55 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA14561 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:43:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id i8GKhssl014281 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:43:54 +0200 Received: (qmail 29655 invoked by uid 65534); 16 Sep 2004 20:43:53 -0000 Received: from D9f19.d.pppool.de (EHLO d9f19.d.pppool.de) (80.184.159.25) by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 16 Sep 2004 22:43:53 +0200 X-Authenticated: #20477425 From: Micha To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] WxWidgets? Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 22:44:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <4149F2D0.7040408@ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <4149F2D0.7040408@ntlworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409162244.05428.micha-1@fantasymail.de> X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4149FB0A.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; micha:01 caml-list:01 2004:99 swig:01 wxpython:01 implemented:01 swig:01 ocamlidl:01 chris:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 schrieb:01 interfaces:01 binding:03 binding:03 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Am Thursday 16 September 2004 22:08 schrieb chris.danx: > Has anyone made such a binding? If not I was thinking about using swig > and the wxpython interfaces as the starting point for a wxwidgets > binding for ocaml. Has anyone tried to do this in the past? Any > thoughts on the issue? I have started some time ago with this and interfaced a few classes of wxwidgets, just to see how it works. I implemented (parts of) the application , window and menu classes and parts of the event system ( you can use 'connect' to connect ocaml functions to menus events); So the basic way was ok. I just wanted to do something different ;-) I don't like the swig way so I didn't use it, but it's a pain to go c++ -> c -> ocaml, massive typing :-), maybe c++ -> c -> ocamlidl would be better... cheers Michael ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners