From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA12732; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:38:37 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA11644 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:38:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from kraid.nerim.net (smtp-105-friday.nerim.net [62.4.16.105]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i8HCcaAo028481 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:38:36 +0200 Received: from localhost (karryall.dnsalias.org [62.4.18.180]) by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F39441A48; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:38:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:38:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040917.143831.108742291.oandrieu@nerim.net> To: chris.danx@ntlworld.com Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] WxWidgets? From: Olivier Andrieu In-Reply-To: <414A05A5.7080603@ntlworld.com> References: <4149F2D0.7040408@ntlworld.com> <20040916202511.GA24789@annexia.org> <414A05A5.7080603@ntlworld.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.64 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 414ADACC.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 andrieu:01 andrieu:01 2004:99 2004:99 swig:01 wxpython:01 gui:01 toolkit:01 lgpl:01 chris:01 chris:01 ocaml:01 gtk:01 gtk:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > "chris.danx" [Thu, 16 Sep 2004]: > Richard Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 09:08:48PM +0100, chris.danx wrote: > > > >>Has anyone made such a binding? If not I was thinking about using swig > >>and the wxpython interfaces as the starting point for a wxwidgets > >>binding for ocaml. Has anyone tried to do this in the past? Any > >>thoughts on the issue? > > > > I've looked into this in the past, but we ended up using Gtk + > > Gtk-Wimp on Windows, which worked quite well. > > How was that? Choosing WxWidgets instead of Gtk+ was an option I was > evaluating (not keen on using gtk+ at all really, it's my least > favourite gui toolkit). I might stick with Gtk+ though! It's not like > it's a commercial application, GTK+ is perfectly fine for commercial applications, it's licensed under the LGPL. -- Olivier ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners