From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA01573; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:43:07 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA01694 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:43:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from sockmel.bononia.it (sockmel.bononia.it [194.242.226.39]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i8L9h3D1023905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:43:05 +0200 Received: from fistandantilus.takhisis.org (sockmel.bononia.it [194.242.226.39]) by sockmel.bononia.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BFC56E62 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:43:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by fistandantilus.takhisis.org (Postfix, from userid 3148) id B9EE63F40AE; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:34:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:34:08 +0200 From: Stefano Zacchiroli To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: OCAML Downcasting? Message-ID: <20040921093408.GA4366@fistandantilus.takhisis.org> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20040921.170339.118021840.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <20040921104306.0e472a0e@localhost.localdomain> <20040921.181531.71542839.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040921.181531.71542839.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 414FF7A7.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; bononia:01 caml-list:01 downcasting:01 2004:99 0900,:01 jacques:01 ocamlc:01 ocamlc:01 bug:01 mli:01 mli:01 bononia:01 ocaml:01 garrigue:01 sep:01 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 06:15:31PM +0900, Jacques GARRIGUE wrote: > > even "ocamlc -i" fails ! > You're right. Anyway, shouldn't this be considered an "ocamlc -i" bug? I used to assume that: ocamlc -i a.ml > a.mli ocamlc -c a.mli ocamlc -c a.ml should work for every compilable a.ml. Was I wrong? -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!- ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners