From: Yamagata Yoriyuki <yoriyuki@mbg.ocn.ne.jp>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] About Obj
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:40:18 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041012.014018.74748925.yoriyuki@mbg.ocn.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200410111633.03459.jon@jdh30.plus.com>
From: Jon Harrop <jon@jdh30.plus.com>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] About Obj (was Recursive lists)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:33:03 +0100
> Yes, your Obj implementation is substantially bigger, more complicated, more
> error prone and more costly on small lists. Just forget this whole thread
> ever happened and consider using a different data structure. :-)
>
> Can Obj not be hidden so that people can't use it so easily?
Yes, it would be nice to have a compiler option which disable all
causes of the evil (Obj.magic, Array.unsafe_get, external etc). Then
we can control where unsafe operations are used.
--
Yamagata Yoriyuki
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-11 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-08 13:20 [Caml-list] Recursive lists Luca Pascali
2004-10-08 13:31 ` Keith Wansbrough
2004-10-08 14:32 ` skaller
2004-10-08 14:42 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-08 15:43 ` David Brown
2004-10-08 17:19 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-08 23:29 ` skaller
2004-10-09 8:35 ` Keith Wansbrough
2004-10-09 9:07 ` skaller
2004-10-09 8:32 ` Keith Wansbrough
2004-10-08 17:18 ` Wolfgang Lux
2004-10-11 0:44 ` Brian Hurt
2004-10-11 6:32 ` William Lovas
2004-10-11 6:52 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2004-10-13 11:29 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-13 11:22 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-11 9:04 ` Keith Wansbrough
2004-10-08 14:05 ` Sébastien Furic
2004-10-08 14:44 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-08 15:09 ` Jon Harrop
2004-10-08 15:13 ` james woodyatt
2004-10-08 14:26 ` sejourne_kevin
2004-10-08 18:28 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-11 8:01 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2004-10-11 9:20 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2004-10-11 13:38 ` [Caml-list] About Obj (was Recursive lists) Christophe Raffalli
2004-10-11 13:49 ` [Caml-list] " Christophe Raffalli
2004-10-11 15:33 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2004-10-11 16:09 ` Richard Jones
2004-10-11 16:40 ` Yamagata Yoriyuki [this message]
2004-10-13 11:59 ` [Caml-list] About Obj Alex Baretta
2004-10-11 16:24 ` [Caml-list] About Obj (was Recursive lists) james woodyatt
2004-10-11 16:46 ` brogoff
2004-10-11 17:24 ` james woodyatt
2004-10-12 0:19 ` skaller
2004-10-20 22:10 ` Greg K
2004-10-12 15:19 ` Christophe Raffalli
2004-10-13 11:42 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-13 21:19 ` brogoff
2004-10-14 9:52 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-10-14 17:38 ` brogoff
2004-10-15 8:22 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-15 17:02 ` brogoff
2004-10-17 13:42 ` Alex Baretta
2004-10-12 6:17 ` [Caml-list] Recursive lists sejourne_kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041012.014018.74748925.yoriyuki@mbg.ocn.ne.jp \
--to=yoriyuki@mbg.ocn.ne.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).