From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E65ABC28 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:10:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iALEAj7x030514 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:10:45 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA31550 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:10:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.36]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with SMTP id iALEAi3r030511 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:10:44 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.113?) (vincenzo?ml@82.48.21.208 with plain) by smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 2004 14:10:44 -0000 From: Vincenzo Ciancia To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The madness of ignoring people Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:14:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200411202343.22273.vincenzo_mlRE.MOVE@yahoo.it> <1101041482.22082.34.camel@pelican.wigram> In-Reply-To: <1101041482.22082.34.camel@pelican.wigram> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411211514.58208.vincenzo_mlRE.MOVE@yahoo.it> X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41A0A1E5.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41A0A1E4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 wrote:01 compiler:01 dynamic:03 loading:04 ignoring:05 ignoring:05 mainstream:06 precise:07 sense:08 feature:08 patch:08 wrong:08 actually:10 interesting:11 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: * On Sunday 21 November 2004 13:51, skaller wrote: > They're not ignoring contributions, they're being > selective as they must be. I see that I was wrong, I misunderstood malc's post. I can't bear when I see people which are actually "ignored" in the sense that they post interesting work and they don't get any reply, but this is not the case - obviously nobody is required to integrate any possible patch in the mainstream compiler (even if, to speak about this precise case, dynamic loading of C code is a very interesting feature). V.