From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941D1BC28 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:33:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iALNXYvd019871 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:33:34 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA19668 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:33:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from annexia.force9.co.uk (annexia.force9.co.uk [212.56.101.183]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iALNXXAA019868 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:33:33 +0100 Received: from rich by annexia.force9.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CW1D3-00079k-00 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:33:33 +0000 Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:33:33 +0000 Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Native executable symtable Message-ID: <20041121233333.GA27482@annexia.org> References: <20041121155909.GA18549@annexia.org> <200411212142.29950.jmg@gaillourdet.net> <929F9986-3BEB-11D9-A20F-000A95CDFBE4@cs.unc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <929F9986-3BEB-11D9-A20F-000A95CDFBE4@cs.unc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Richard Jones X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41A125CE.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41A125CD.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 symtable:01 kumar:01 wrote:01 bytecoded:01 ocaml:01 bytecode:01 topology:01 run-time:01 recompiled:01 ...:98 lesson:98 executables:01 native:02 native:02 X-Attachments: type="application/pgp-signature" name="signature.asc" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 01:31:34PM -0500, Ritesh Kumar wrote: > Well, I just know that currently no bytecoded language (Java/.NET/OcaML= =20 > bytecode) could give me the 7 to 8 times performance boost in run time= =20 > taken by some of the network topology analysis tools I made for my=20 > research work. [...] You are right=20 > about the fact that dynamic run-time optimizations might be interesting= =20 > from a performance perspective esp. looking at a functional value=20 > oriented language like ML. However, it is still a "research" problem=20 > and has research interest. I'd like to say in addition, the HP Dynamo project, where a lot of this hope for dynamic recompilation came from, recompiled native executables. Rich. --=20 Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://www.j-london.com/ >>> http://www.team-notepad.com/ - collaboration tools for teams <<< Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - improving website return on investment http://subjectlink.com/ - Lesson plans and source material for teachers --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFBoSXM4le1M6q9pzoRAu4xAJQIps4hKoVz6UwzK4kl5HK27Ap0AJ4qi3Fd aVUFSwjc8Q0cSQSDU7nmPQ== =KUPC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy--