From: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
To: skaller@users.sourceforge.net
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Type constraints
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 13:53:29 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041209.135329.123726097.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1102561644.2611.2.camel@pelican.wigram>
From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
> On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 01:23, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
>
> > Yet, modules are strange beasts for typing, so I wouldn't add the code
> > before thinking it through.
>
> I am curious as to the status of COQ support for verifying
> assertions about proposed changes to the type system.
>
> For example supposing you did 'think it through' and it
> seemed right, would you be able to then extend an
> existing COQ proof and attempt to prove your thinking
> mechanically?
Unfortunately, I'm afraid we are still pretty far from that.
Supposing we could describe all the properties we need in Coq
(probably possible, but far from easy), a very long and harduous
proof is waiting.
If there is a breakthrough, I would be most happy to check everything,
as I know there are bugs in the compiler. I just discovered a stupid
unsoundness today.
Jacques Garrigue
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-09 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-06 19:55 Jim Farrand
2004-12-07 7:12 ` [Caml-list] " Alain Frisch
2004-12-07 13:43 ` Damien Doligez
2004-12-07 14:57 ` Andreas Rossberg
2004-12-07 17:44 ` Damien Doligez
2004-12-07 18:08 ` Alain Frisch
2004-12-07 21:04 ` Damien Doligez
2004-12-07 21:43 ` Alain Frisch
2004-12-08 3:30 ` nakata keiko
[not found] ` <8002B033-4906-11D9-8195-000D9345235C@inria.fr>
2004-12-09 0:56 ` nakata keiko
2004-12-09 1:27 ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-12-08 10:53 ` Damien Doligez
2004-12-08 12:39 ` Alain Frisch
2004-12-08 14:23 ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-12-09 3:07 ` skaller
2004-12-09 4:53 ` Jacques Garrigue [this message]
2004-12-08 16:10 ` Xavier Leroy
2004-12-07 18:13 ` William Lovas
2004-12-08 0:27 ` Jacques Garrigue
2004-12-07 18:41 ` Boris Yakobowski
2004-12-07 19:38 ` Jim Farrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041209.135329.123726097.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
--to=garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).